Search
Articles
- Event Analyses (20)
- Articles (87)
- Election Analyses (24)
Local elections for municipal and city councils and municipal and city mayors were held in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) on 2. October 2016. These were the sixth local elections since the Dayton Peace Agreement. There was generally not much expectation for significant change in BiH politics, and the elections were seen as a test on to what extent the major political parties are familiar with citizens’ concerns, especially at the local level. A change in the Electoral Law a few months ahead of the elections had increased the importance of party structures and party leaders in determining the allocation of seats among candidates from party lists, while decreasing the influence of voters. Coupled with an electoral system that favors small parties, this could potentially result in further fragmentation of the party system. During the electoral campaign, a popular referendum on a disputed national holiday in Republika Srpska (RS), scheduled one week before the local elections, overshadowed any local issues both in RS and in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH). That said, these elections continued the established dynamic of intra-ethnic competition in BiH where parties compete for voters within the ethnic group they represent. Although independent candidates and non-ethnic parties achieved respectable results, these were not enough to bring about meaningful change.
Damir Kapidžić
Damir Kapidžić is an Assistant Professor of Comparative Politics at the Faculty of Political Science of the University of Sarajevo. He is also a researcher with the LSE-based Justice and Security Research Programme, and a researcher with the Uni Fribourg-RRPP Balkan Comparative Electoral Study. His field of expertise includes Balkan politics and formal and informal institutions in multiethnic states. His research focuses on the legitimation of democratic and authoritarian politics, institutionalization of ethnicity through electoral and party politics, and forms of hybrid governance and the legitimacy of resulting public authority.