Special issue :The Europeanisation of candidate countries: the case for a shift to the concept of EU member-state building
The research on the impact of the European Union on its candidate countries has been traditionally framed within the concept of Europeanisation. But the term, notwithstanding two decades of usage, still lacks clarity in its attributes and its referent. Moreover, the statehood of candidate countries has emerged as a prerequisite for its effectiveness, providing no answer for cases of limited statehood and limited Europeanisation. The concept of member-state building, which refers to the EU’s purpose of building functional member states while integrating them, may help reframe the academic discussion on the impact of the EU on candidate countries, particularly in limited statehood contexts, by complementing it with insights from the literature on state building. Deriving from an understanding of sovereignty as responsibility, member-state building highlights the paradoxes of simultaneous state building and European integration, given their competing logics of sovereignty concentration and sovereignty diffusion. To solve the dilemma, nevertheless, member-state building has one further resource. By exploiting the lack of a single blueprint and the possibility of different solutions for institutions to be compatible with EU requirements, member-state building can also foster domestic ownership and legitimacy, thus evading the trap of imposed international state building.
Davide Denti is a PhD candidate at the School of International Studies, University of Trento. He holds MAs in International Relations from University of Milan (2008) and in European Studies from the College of Europe, where he served as teaching assistant. His research interests include EU politics and Europeanisation, EU enlargement and the Western Balkans. His PhD project looks at the EU enlargement as a process of construction of member states.
1. Why has europeanisation come to be a dominant approach in European studies in the last twenty years?
2. Which limitations did the concept of europeanisation show over time?
3. Why is europeanisation unable to tackle issues of statehood in candidate countries?
4. What does member-state building refer to, in comparison with europeanisation and with "liberal peace" international state building?
5. How would member-state building suggest to act, in order to improve the legitimacy of EU actions in candidate countries?
Elbasani, Arolda. 2013. European Integration and Transformation in the Western Balkans: Europeanization or Business as Usual?. London: Routledge.
Keil, Soeren and Jens Woelk. 2013. Special Issue: Europeanization, State-Building and Democratization in the Western Balkans. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 41(3). http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cnap20/41/3.
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2009. Europeanization Beyond Europe. Living Reviews in European Governance 4(3). http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2009-3.
Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2011. Europeanisation in New Member and Candidate States. Living Reviews in European Governance 6(1). http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2011-1.